In a recent interview, Serite clarified his role as a brand ambassador for CEDA, emphasizing that he is not an employee and operates as a contracted service provider. Amidst social media allegations of corruption and conflicts of interest, Serite firmly denied any wrongdoing, asserting that he has adhered to all necessary protocols in his business dealings.
- Serite is a contracted service provider.
- Accusations of corruption and conflict of interest.
- Clarified ownership of RocoMamas franchise.
- Safari Vehicle Rental funded after due diligence.
- Engaging a lawyer for legal proceedings.
- Emphasized journalistic integrity and verification.
Understanding Serite’s Role with CEDA: Clarifying Misconceptions
What does it mean to be a brand ambassador for CEDA? Serite’s recent statements shed light on his position, highlighting the differences between being a contracted service provider and a full-time employee. His involvement has sparked discussions about transparency and integrity within CEDA.
Serite’s Business Ventures: Transparency and Accountability
Serite addressed allegations regarding his business interests, particularly his connection to RocoMamas Restaurant and Elephant Paw Proprietary Limited. He clarified that he does not own the RocoMamas franchise in Francistown and that his car rental business was funded only after thorough vetting by CEDA.
- Serite is a contracted service provider, not a CEDA employee.
- He does not own the RocoMamas franchise; the owner is Gaofenngwe Koosimile.
- His Safari Vehicle Rental business was funded after meeting CEDA’s requirements.
- Serite maintains transparency in his business dealings with CEDA.
Addressing Allegations: The Importance of Due Diligence
Serite emphasized the significance of due diligence in his business applications to CEDA. He stated that he declared his interests before applying for funding, ensuring no conflicts existed. This proactive approach underscores the importance of transparency in business practices.
Social Media and Public Perception: Navigating the Court of Public Opinion
With accusations circulating on social media, Serite expressed concern over the impact of public opinion on his reputation. He highlighted the difference between allegations and verified evidence, advocating for a fair assessment based on facts rather than assumptions.
In conclusion, Serite’s clarifications aim to restore his reputation and emphasize the importance of ethical practices in business. His commitment to transparency and accountability serves as a reminder of the need for integrity in all professional dealings.
