From ‘Dirty Sauce’ to ‘Money Grab’: Heated Debate on Severance Pay in Moorslede

Severance Pay Controversy in Moorslede: From 'Dirty Sauce' to 'Money Grab'

During a heated council meeting, Ward Gillis raised concerns about a controversial payout, prompting Geert Vanthuyne's sharp retort, igniting further debate on political ethics.

Marie Dupont4 hours agoLast Update : 4 hours ago

Van ‘vuile sos’ tot ‘pak-de-poenshow’: vraag over uittredingsvergoedingen mondt uit in scheldpartij op gemeenteraad (Moorslede)

www.nieuwsblad.be

During the Moorslede municipal council meeting on April 25, 2025, a heated exchange erupted over exit compensations. This incident highlights ongoing tensions in local politics, particularly regarding financial transparency and accountability.

6 Key Takeaways

Oppositieraadslid Gillis questions exit compensation requests.
Vanthuyne insults Gillis during council meeting.
Budget for mayor's salary increases by €53,000.
Former officials eligible for exit compensation.
Sioen highlights legal obligation for compensation requests.
Gillis criticizes misuse of taxpayer funds.

Fast Answer: The recent council meeting in Moorslede has sparked concerns over exit compensations, impacting local taxpayers and political trust.

What Led to the Heated Debate on Exit Compensations in Moorslede?

The debate was ignited by opposition council member Ward Gillis (PRO), who questioned the increased budget for exit compensations. This budget is set to rise by €53,000 to €347,180 for 2025, primarily due to expected requests for exit compensations. Key points include:

Former officials can claim exit compensations.
Gillis criticized the recent application for compensation, calling it a misuse of taxpayer funds.
Finance Alderman Andries Sioen (STERK) confirmed the budget increase is precautionary.

This situation serves as a warning about the potential misuse of public funds, raising questions about political ethics in Belgium.

As Moorslede navigates these challenges, residents are encouraged to stay informed and engage in local governance discussions. Will local leaders prioritize transparency in future budget decisions?