The constitutional court’s ruling on the Evras programme has stirred significant attention across Belgium. On 2025-05-15 18:33:00, the court dismissed appeals against the decrees that formalised the cooperation agreement between the French Community, the Walloon Region, and the French Community Commission. This decision upholds the controversial Evras guide, which focuses on sexual education in schools.
- Islamic organizations challenged Evras cooperation decrees
- Constitutional Court dismissed all legal appeals
- Court confirmed legality of Evras guidelines
- Evras respects educational neutrality principle
- Program delivers objective, critical, pluralistic information
- Students not forced to reveal private information
Several Islamic organisations, alongside a far-right association, had challenged the decrees, arguing that Evras violated principles such as educational neutrality and freedom of thought. Yet, the court firmly rejected these claims, confirming that the programme remains neutral and respects individual rights.
What does this mean for Belgian schools and parents? The court’s verdict clarifies the legal framework surrounding Evras, paving the way for continued implementation without fears of indoctrination or privacy breaches.
How does this ruling impact the ongoing debate about sexual education in Belgium? It settles legal uncertainties and reinforces the state’s role in providing objective, pluralistic education. The decision highlights key points:
- Evras is deemed neutral, avoiding indoctrination in schools.
- The programme respects freedom of thought and religious beliefs.
- Students’ private and family lives are protected, with no forced disclosure of personal information.
- The ruling dismisses objections from both Islamic groups and far-right entities.
Looking ahead, schools and policymakers must focus on transparent communication about Evras to build trust among parents and communities. Could this decision encourage more inclusive education debates in Belgium? Only time will tell, but the court’s stance sets a firm foundation for progress.
