Belgian Court Frees Man Again.. Woman Intoxicated But Not Drunk in Assault Case

Belgian Court Frees Man Again in Assault Case Involving Intoxicated Woman

On March 22, 2021, a young woman in Gent accused a man of rape, but the court ruled no proof beyond reasonable doubt due to her alcohol level.
Marie Dupont23 May 2025Last Update :
Rechter spreekt opnieuw man (25) vrij in verkrachtingszaak: “Vrouw was onder invloed, maar niet dronken”
www.standaard.be

Sexual assault cases in Belgium continue to spark intense debate, especially regarding consent and intoxication. A recent ruling on 2025-05-23 01:41:00 from a Gent court highlights these complexities, focusing on the difficult question of when intoxication invalidates consent in alleged rape cases.

6 Key Takeaways
  • Woman reported rape after waking beside man
  • Prosecutor dismissed case; woman filed complaint
  • Court acquitted man due to insufficient evidence
  • Law requires "laveloos dronken" for rape
  • Toxicology showed intoxication, not drunkenness
  • New sexual law demands extreme drunkenness status

The case involved a young woman who accused a 25-year-old man of rape after a night out in Gent in March 2021. The court ultimately acquitted the man, citing insufficient evidence that the woman was “laveloos dronken” (dead drunk) or unconscious during the encounter. This decision raises critical questions about how Belgian law interprets consent under the influence.

How should the law balance protecting victims with ensuring fair trials? And what role does the new sexual offence legislation play in these judgments? These issues set the stage for the fast answer below.

Fast Answer: Belgian courts require clear proof of extreme intoxication or unconsciousness to convict rape cases involving alcohol, as seen in recent Gent rulings applying the 2022 sexual offence law.

Does being under the influence automatically mean a person cannot consent? Belgian courts say no, emphasizing the need for “laveloos” or deep unconsciousness. This approach reflects ongoing challenges in interpreting consent legally when alcohol is involved.

  • The Gent court found the victim sent clear messages and returned to bed voluntarily after the incident.
  • Toxicology reports showed intoxication but not to the level that negated consciousness or consent.
  • The new 2022 sexual offence law requires severe intoxication to establish non-consent in such cases.
  • Earlier controversial rulings, like the Leuven case, show the legal system grappling with these nuances.
Belgium’s evolving sexual offence laws aim to clarify consent but still face scrutiny over how intoxication is judged in courts.

As public debate grows, Belgium must continue refining legal standards and awareness around consent and intoxication. Will future reforms better protect victims without compromising fair trials? Staying informed and engaged is crucial for all Belgians.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


We use cookies to personalize content and ads , to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic...Learn More

Accept
Follow us on Telegram Follow us on Twitter