The ongoing legal case involving a Belgian man accused of spiritual fraud has captured attention, especially as Kevin De Bruyne’s transfer to Napoli dominates sports headlines. On 2025-06-11 22:27:00, the Hasselt correctional court heard updates on the case where the accused failed to appear, while De Bruyne is currently focused on his move to Italy.
- Geen KDB aanwezig in correctionele rechtbank
- Verdachte contacteerde De Bruyne met spirituele claims
- Verdachte eerder veroordeeld voor meervoudige oplichting
- Procureur eist 10 maanden cel en boete
- Advocaat vraagt vrijspraak wegens gebrek opzet
- Vonnis wordt verwacht op 25 juni
The case revolves around allegations that the man targeted vulnerable individuals, including De Bruyne and Shanna Wouters, a local woman with a connective tissue disease. Despite the serious accusations, the accused no longer demands damages after reaching a confidential settlement. But what does this mean for victims and the wider community?
As the court prepares to deliver its verdict on 25 June, questions remain about the balance between belief in alternative healing and protection from exploitation. This leads US to the key facts of the case and its implications for Belgium.
How should Belgian courts handle cases where spiritual beliefs intersect with potential fraud? This case highlights the challenge of distinguishing sincere belief from deception. Key points include:
- The accused sent numerous unsolicited letters to De Bruyne, who is abroad for his Napoli transfer.
- Shanna Wouters, suffering from a serious illness, was offered costly spiritual treatments.
- The suspect has a prior conviction for similar offences, raising concerns about recidivism.
- The defence argues the contacts were non-threatening and based on genuine belief.
As the verdict approaches, Belgian society must ask: how can we better safeguard individuals without infringing on freedoms of belief? Staying informed and vigilant will be crucial in navigating these complex issues moving forward.
