Agent Who Hit Fabian (11) Faces Brussels Court.. Shocking Escape Through Back Exit

Agent Who Hit Fabian Faces Brussels Court After Shocking Escape

In Ganshoren, an 11-year-old boy on an electric scooter was fatally struck by a police officer who pursued him without sirens, raising serious questions.
Marie Dupont13 June 2025Last Update :
Agent die Fabian (11) aanreed voor raadkamer verschenen en via achteruitgang verdwenen (Brussel)
www.nieuwsblad.be

The tragic case of Fabian Ormanji, an 11-year-old boy fatally struck by a police officer in Ganshoren, continues to raise questions about law enforcement practices in Belgium. On 2 June, Fabian was hit while riding an electric scooter home, leading to widespread public concern. As of 2025-06-13 12:50:00, the officer involved appeared before the council chamber, with a decision pending on his further detention.

6 Key Takeaways
  • Agent hit Fabian Ormanji, causing death
  • Fabian fled police while riding electric scooter
  • Police chased without siren or flashing lights
  • Agent arrested, faces charges for traffic obstruction
  • Council to decide on agent's detention status
  • Investigation led by Brussels public prosecutor's office

Fabian fled from police control because he was too young to use the scooter legally. The police pursued him without activating sirens or lights, resulting in the fatal collision. This detail has intensified scrutiny over the officer’s conduct and the protocols followed during the chase.

What does this incident reveal about police accountability and safety measures in Belgium? And how will the justice system respond to such a sensitive case? The upcoming council chamber ruling will provide more clarity.

Fast Answer: The Ganshoren police officer involved in Fabian Ormanji’s fatal accident faces a decision on continued detention after a controversial pursuit without sirens, highlighting calls for stricter police oversight in Belgium.

Could this tragedy prompt changes in how police handle young scooter users or high-speed chases? The case underscores several critical points:

  • Use of sirens and lights is mandatory during police pursuits but was reportedly absent here.
  • The officer’s statements conflicted with findings from Comité P, Belgium’s police oversight body.
  • Electronic monitoring was imposed, yet the council chamber must decide on further detention.
  • Public trust in police procedures may hinge on transparent investigation outcomes.
This case highlights the ongoing debate in Belgium around police pursuit protocols and the protection of vulnerable youths using electric scooters.

As the Belgian justice system prepares to decide the officer’s fate, citizens and authorities alike must reflect on safeguarding public safety while ensuring responsible policing. Will this lead to stronger regulations and better training for police officers nationwide?

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


We use cookies to personalize content and ads , to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic...Learn More

Accept
Follow us on Telegram Follow us on Twitter