Genk Nurse Faces.. 6 Years Prison Appeal Over Elderly Maria Blanco’s Death

Genk Nurse Appeals 6-Year Prison Term Over Elderly Death

Cancer patient Maria Blanco died under suspicious circumstances in ZOL hospital, with a mysterious coin found in her throat possibly linked to her sudden death.
Marie Dupont14 June 2025Last Update :
Genkse verpleegkundige riskeert ook in beroep 6 jaar cel voor dood Maria Blanco (70)
www.hbvl.be

The mysterious death of cancer patient Maria Blanco in Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg (ZOL) Genk continues to captivate Belgian public attention more than a decade later. Despite her terminal illness, an autopsy revealed her death was not caused by cancer but by an overdose of the painkiller pethidine. This discovery sparked allegations against a Genk nurse suspected of administering an extra dose, raising difficult questions about medical responsibility and justice.

6 Key Takeaways
  • Maria Blanco died under suspicious hospital circumstances.
  • Autopsy revealed pethidine overdose, not cancer death.
  • Defense highlights mysterious coin found in throat.
  • Court debates classification: poisoning or murder?
  • Prosecutor demands six-year sentence for nurse.
  • Final verdict expected on September 11.

On 2025-06-14 04:25:00, the appeals court revisited the complex case, which has seen conflicting interpretations between correctional and assize courts. The debate centers on whether Blanco’s death was a deliberate poison murder or an unintended consequence of medication errors. Adding to the intrigue is the discovery of a coin lodged in Blanco’s windpipe, a cultural ritual symbolizing a peaceful journey to the afterlife, which her lawyer argues may have contributed to her death.

How do these conflicting theories affect the pursuit of truth in this prolonged legal battle? And what does this mean for patient safety standards in Belgium’s healthcare system? The latest developments set the stage for a critical judicial decision.

Fast Answer: The Genk nurse faces up to six years in prison for administering excessive pain medication to Maria Blanco, but the appeals court’s ruling on 11 September will determine if the death was murder or accidental, keeping Belgian healthcare scrutiny alive.

This case highlights the challenges in distinguishing between medical error and criminal intent in end-of-life care. The appeals court must weigh new hypotheses and overlooked evidence, such as the mysterious coin in Blanco’s throat, which could shift the legal outcome dramatically.

  • The prosecution maintains the nurse’s guilt without referral to assize courts.
  • The defense argues the coin caused fatal suffocation, not the medication.
  • Experts presented conflicting findings on the timing and effects of pethidine administration.
  • The prolonged 11-year investigation raises concerns about judicial delays and patient justice.
This case underscores the importance of transparent medical investigations and judicial clarity in Belgium’s healthcare system, especially when terminal patients’ deaths are contested.

As the verdict approaches, Belgian citizens and healthcare professionals alike await clarity. Will justice be served, and can this case prompt stronger safeguards for vulnerable patients? The outcome on 11 September could redefine standards for medical accountability in Belgium.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


We use cookies to personalize content and ads , to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic...Learn More

Accept
Follow us on Telegram Follow us on Twitter