Two-Thirds Brussels Unemployed Escape Checks..Urgent Call for Radical Activation Reform

Two-Thirds of Brussels Unemployed Avoid Benefits Urgent Reform Needed

Brussels unemployment controls are declining sharply, with two-thirds of jobless receiving no oversight—what new activation policies could reshape the future?
Marie Dupont25 June 2025Last Update :
Twee op de drie Brusselse werklozen krijgen geen controle: “Er is een totaal anders activeringsbeleid nodig” - De Standaard
www.standaard.be

Brussels faces a growing concern as two out of three unemployed individuals are reportedly not subjected to any control measures. This development highlights significant gaps in the activation policy aimed at supporting jobseekers in the region. As of 2025-06-25 12:51:00, the effectiveness of Actiris, the Brussels employment agency, is under scrutiny for its diminishing oversight.

5 Key Takeaways
  • Two-thirds of Brussels unemployed lack controls
  • Calls for a completely different activation policy
  • Actiris reduces monitoring of job seekers
  • Concerns over effectiveness of current policies
  • Need for enhanced oversight in unemployment system

Recent reports suggest that the current approach may not be sufficient to motivate and assist Brussels’ unemployed population effectively. With fewer controls in place, how can authorities ensure that jobseekers are actively pursuing employment opportunities? And what alternative strategies could better serve the city’s workforce?

These questions lead US to examine the need for a revamped activation policy that balances support with accountability, ensuring Brussels’ jobseekers receive the right guidance and encouragement.

Fast Answer: Two-thirds of Brussels’ unemployed are not being monitored, signaling a need for stronger activation policies and improved oversight by Actiris to better support local jobseekers.

Why is the control over unemployed individuals decreasing, and what does this mean for Brussels’ labour market? The current situation raises concerns about the effectiveness of existing policies and their impact on employment rates.

  • Reduced monitoring may lead to lower motivation among jobseekers.
  • Actiris’ limited controls could hinder early intervention and support.
  • A new activation policy might better address individual needs and local challenges.
This issue directly affects Brussels’ economic recovery and social cohesion, making it essential for policymakers to reassess employment strategies in the capital region.

Moving forward, Brussels must explore innovative activation methods that combine rigorous follow-up with personalised support. Only then can the city hope to reduce unemployment and foster a more dynamic labour market.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


We use cookies to personalize content and ads , to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic...Learn More

Accept
Follow us on Telegram Follow us on Twitter