Over 25% Removed Speed Cameras Hit Limburg.. Ex-Minister Slams Populist Move

Over 25% Speed Cameras Removed in Limburg, Ex-Minister Criticizes

Trajectcontroles in Limburg face massive cuts, sparking outrage as officials warn this dangerous move risks lives and undermines road safety priorities.
Marie Dupont5 hours agoLast Update :
Over 25% Removed Speed Cameras Hit Limburg.. Ex-Minister Slams Populist Move
news.google.com

The decision to remove over 70 speed cameras, or trajectcontroles, across Flanders has sparked intense debate, especially in Limburg. As of 2025-07-04 19:39:00, the announcement has raised concerns about road safety and government priorities in the region.

6 Key Takeaways
  • Meer dan 25% trajectcontroles geschrapt in Limburg
  • Voormalig minister noemt schrapping puur populisme
  • Vooruit noemt schrapping van 70 trajectcontroles vreemd
  • Burgemeester vreest doden door schrapping controles
  • Groen hekelt gebrek aan verkeersveiligheid prioriteit
  • 22 geplande trajectcontroles in Limburg geschrapt

More than one in four of these cancelled speed controls are located in Limburg, a province already grappling with traffic safety issues. Former ministers and local officials have voiced frustration, calling the move “pure populism” and warning that it could lead to more accidents.

With public safety at stake, how will the Flemish government justify this controversial cut? And what message does it send about traffic enforcement in Limburg? The answers are becoming clearer as reactions pour in.

Fast Answer: Over 70 trajectcontroles in Flanders are being scrapped, with 22 in Limburg alone, raising serious concerns among local leaders about a potential rise in traffic accidents and reduced road safety enforcement.

Is this reduction in speed cameras a step backward for traffic safety? Critics argue it is, highlighting several key points:

  • Local officials, including Tongeren-Borgloon’s mayor Feytons, warn that removing controls risks more fatalities.
  • Former ministers label the decision as political populism rather than a safety-driven choice.
  • Opposition parties like Vooruit call the cut a “strange signal” undermining road safety efforts.
  • Environmental party Groen stresses that traffic safety seems low on the Flemish government’s agenda.
This development is critical for Limburg, where traffic safety is already a pressing issue. Reduced enforcement may increase risks on busy roads and highways.

As the debate continues, citizens and policymakers must ask: how can road safety be ensured without adequate monitoring? It is crucial for the Flemish government to reconsider or provide clear alternatives to protect drivers and pedestrians alike.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


We use cookies to personalize content and ads , to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic...Learn More

Accept
Follow us on Telegram Follow us on Twitter