The new federal program law in Belgium introduces a significant change: people unemployed for more than two years will no longer receive benefits. This controversial reform, approved in the Chamber’s Work Committee in mid-June and set for further discussion on 2025-07-08 14:08:00, aims to encourage quicker reintegration into the workforce.
- Federale regering beperkt werkloosheidsuitkering na twee jaar
- François De Smet vraagt uitzondering voor leerkrachten
- Raad van State waarschuwt voor mogelijke discriminatie
- Clarinval handhaaft uitzondering voor zorgsector
- Meer uitzonderingen bedreigen premier De Wevers beleid
- Kamer stemt binnenkort over programmawet met uitzonderingen
However, exceptions exist for those training in shortage occupations, such as nurses and care workers. Recently, an amendment proposed by François De Smet (Défi) seeks to extend this exception to teachers in training. This proposal has sparked debate over potential discrimination and fairness in how exceptions are applied.
With the law’s final vote approaching, many are asking: should exceptions be broadened to other critical sectors? And what are the risks if the government sticks to the current restrictive approach? Here’s a clear summary of the situation.
Is the government’s selective approach to exceptions justified? The Council of State questions whether limiting exemptions to certain professions is fair or legally sound. Key points to consider include:
- Exceptions are allowed only if based on objective, reasonable criteria.
- The current list focuses on healthcare but excludes other sectors facing labour shortages, like education and construction.
- Extending exceptions risks opening the door to many claims, potentially undermining the law’s intent.
- Legal challenges at the Constitutional Court or Council of State may arise if the law remains unchanged.
As the Chamber prepares for the upcoming plenary vote, all eyes are on whether lawmakers will broaden exceptions or risk legal battles. Will the government find a balanced solution that supports vulnerable workers without compromising the law’s goals? Belgian citizens and employers alike await clarity.
