Joris, 38, Rejected From Indoor Playground Sparks Outrage..Mental Age Revealed

Joris 38 Rejected From Indoor Playground Sparks Outrage in Belgium

Joris, 38, has the mental age of a child but was recently denied entry to a play center, sparking debate on true inclusion in Belgium.
Marie Dupont29 July 2025Last Update :
Joris (38) uit Beringen heeft mentale leeftijd van kind, maar is weggestuurd uit binnenspeeltuin: "Zijn wereld is ingestort"
www.vrt.be

In Belgium, the topic of inclusion often sparks debate, especially when it involves people with different mental ages. On 2025-07-29 18:33:00, a story emerged about Joris, a 38-year-old from Beringen who has the mental age of an 11-year-old. Despite his young mindset, he was recently refused entry to an indoor playground, barred from playing with children his age.

6 Key Takeaways
  • Joris (38) has mental age of 11
  • Joris was recently denied indoor playground access
  • Mother states denial shattered his world
  • Inclusion efforts fail, says Evi Neven
  • Evi Neven leads Orthopedagogie at UCLL
  • Case highlights challenges in social inclusion

This incident has left Joris and his family devastated. His mother described how “his world has collapsed” after being excluded. But was the refusal justified? The case raises important questions about how well Belgium is embracing true inclusion for people with intellectual disabilities.

How can society balance safety and fairness in public spaces? And why do such exclusionary moments still happen when awareness is growing? The answers reveal challenges in implementing inclusive practices across Belgium.

Fast Answer: In Belgium, Joris’s exclusion highlights ongoing struggles to ensure inclusive environments for adults with childlike mental ages, showing the need for more awareness and accommodations nationwide.

Is it right to deny someone access based on mental age rather than chronological age? This example shows the gaps in Belgium’s inclusion efforts. Experts like Evi Neven from UCLL stress that:

  • Policies often fail to accommodate mental age differences.
  • Public venues lack clear guidelines for inclusion.
  • Families face emotional distress when loved ones are excluded.
  • More training in orthopedagogy and awareness is needed.
Belgium continues to develop laws and frameworks promoting inclusion, but real-life cases like Joris’s reveal the gap between policy and practice that must be addressed urgently.

Moving forward, Belgium must foster better understanding and practical solutions to support people like Joris. How can communities ensure everyone feels welcome? Only through ongoing dialogue and commitment to inclusion can such heartbreaking exclusions become a thing of the past.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


We use cookies to personalize content and ads , to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic...Learn More

Accept
Follow us on Telegram Follow us on Twitter