Two days after the riots at The Hague’s Malieveld, discussions have erupted about the events, accountability, and underlying causes. Most analyses come from those who were not present, often focusing on sociological theories and terminology like fascism, hooliganism, or political violence. Observations from the site itself, however, reveal the true nature of the participants and their motivations. This raises the question: do the speakers at ElsFest know who they are addressing? Do they even want to know? (Published: 2025-09-22 14:09:00)
- Rellen op het Haagse Malieveld gebeurden recentelijk.
- Els Noort organiseerde de demonstratie en is PVV-aanhanger.
- Hooligans waren aanwezig en veroorzaakten geweld.
- Demonstratie trok mensen met verschillende motieven.
- Noort had weinig invloed op de menigte.
- Extreemrechts gedachtengoed was zichtbaar bij het podium.
Els Noort, the organizer of the demonstration, has gained attention but little is known about her beyond her political views. A supporter of the PVV, she has shifted allegiances but remains a far-right figure. This was her first and claimed last demonstration.
Noort can be seen as an influencer in a market filled with right-wing voices. Despite her efforts to raise funds for the demonstration, she has few followers, possibly due to a lack of distinctiveness. Her combination of extreme right rhetoric and Christianity may not resonate broadly in the Netherlands.
The demonstration was intended to elevate her profile, and it likely succeeded. However, influencers like Noort often struggle for genuine influence. While she aims for a peaceful protest, she is overshadowed by more aggressive elements within the crowd.
Speakers like Wybren van Haga use the demonstration to attract voters, often ignoring the chaotic atmosphere. The crowd is not cohesive; many attendees do not heed calls for peace and instead engage in violence.
Those at the podium may not understand their audience. Van Haga praises football supporters, unaware of their violent intentions. The presence of extremist symbols and flags suggests that the crowd includes more than just concerned citizens.
The speakers have their political or commercial interests, while the crowd has varied motivations, from genuine concerns to a desire for violence. The lack of accountability among speakers exacerbates the situation, as they amplify negative narratives about asylum seekers, further inciting fear and anger.
This event serves as a warning about the potential for future violence and the growing disconnect between political leaders and their audiences. Monitoring the aftermath and the evolving dynamics of such protests will be crucial.
