On February 10, 2025, a shocking incident involving a member of the Indonesian Navy emerged. The firearm used in the shooting of a car rental boss in Jakarta-Merak belonged to Sertu Akbar Adli, an aide to a high-ranking military official. How did a military aide get involved in such a serious crime?
- TNI AL member involved in shooting case
- Gun owned by defendant Sertu Akbar Adli
- Weapon type: Arex Zero 2 pistol
- Shooting incident involved multiple gunshots
- Victim Ramli shot from close range
- Case related to rental car shooting
Military Aide Involved in Jakarta Shooting Raises Serious Concerns
This incident has sparked questions about the use of military firearms in civilian areas. How can a service weapon be involved in a crime? The shooting, which occurred on a busy highway, involved multiple shots fired by Navy personnel. This alarming event calls for a closer look at military protocols regarding firearms.
Details of the Shooting Incident and Its Implications
The shooting incident involved Sertu Akbar Adli’s service weapon, a Kopaska-organic Arex Zero 2. The accused, Kelasi Kepala Bambang Apri Atmojo, fired multiple rounds, hitting a victim at close range. This raises critical questions about military accountability and the protocols surrounding the issuance of firearms.
Key Facts About the Shooting Incident and Military Involvement
Several important details have emerged regarding the shooting:
- The firearm belonged to Sertu Akbar Adli, aide to Pangkolinlamil.
- Bambang Apri Atmojo fired five shots during the incident.
- The shooting occurred on a busy highway, raising public safety concerns.
- Military firearms regulations are now under scrutiny following this event.
Understanding the Consequences of Military Firearm Use
This incident underscores the need for stringent regulations on military firearm use. With military personnel involved in civilian incidents, the potential for misuse increases. It’s essential to address these concerns to ensure public safety and maintain trust in military operations.
As the investigation unfolds, it is vital for authorities to reassess firearm regulations within the military. The public deserves to know that their safety is a priority, and accountability measures are in place to prevent similar incidents in the future.
