Minneapolis Scraps Violence Interrupter Contract Following Recent Shooting Incident

"Minneapolis Ends Violence Interrupter Contract After Shooting"

McReynolds and Watkins allegedly fired 70 rounds in north Minneapolis, with McReynolds using a Ruger-5.7 pistol during the incident.
Emily Johnson18 March 2025Last Update :
Minneapolis withdraws violence interrupter contract plan post-shooting
www.startribune.com

On March 10, 2025, in north Minneapolis, violence erupted when McReynolds and Watkins allegedly fired dozens of bullets on the 3600 block between Queen and Penn Avenues. According to court and police records, ShotSpotter technology recorded a total of 70 rounds fired during the incident.

6 Key Takeaways
  • McReynolds and Watkins fired dozens of bullets.
  • ShotSpotter recorded 70 rounds fired.
  • McReynolds works for 21 Days of Peace.
  • Watkins identified as a violence interrupter.
  • Police used surveillance to recreate the scene.
  • McReynolds requested his .22-caliber pistol.

Both McReynolds and Watkins are associated with violence prevention efforts; McReynolds works for the nonprofit organization 21 Days of Peace. The shooting occurred shortly after a barbecue had concluded in the area.

Fast Answer: On March 10, 2025, in north Minneapolis, McReynolds and Watkins allegedly fired 70 rounds from sidewalks and alleys. Both are affiliated with a violence prevention nonprofit called 21 Days of Peace.

The incident began shortly after a neighborhood barbecue ended. Surveillance footage revealed that within eight seconds of the gunfire starting, McReynolds was seen lying near a tree stump on Penn Avenue while firing a Ruger-5.7 pistol. Approximately 40 seconds later, he resumed firing and instructed Watkins to retrieve another firearm from his vehicle.

Key details surrounding the shooting include:

  • Date: March 10, 2025
  • Location: North Minneapolis
  • Total rounds fired: 70
  • Weapons involved: Ruger-5.7 pistol and .22-caliber pistol

This event raised serious concerns regarding public safety in the area as both individuals were previously engaged in community violence prevention efforts. The use of firearms by those involved in such initiatives has prompted discussions about accountability and effectiveness in addressing local violence.

Notice: Canadian readers should be aware that gun control laws differ significantly between Canada and the united states. This incident highlights ongoing challenges related to firearm regulations and community safety.

The shooting incident involving McReynolds and Watkins underscores significant issues surrounding gun violence even among those who work towards preventing it. As investigations continue, community leaders may need to reassess strategies for addressing violent behavior effectively.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


We use cookies to personalize content and ads , to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic...Learn More

Accept
Follow us on Telegram Follow us on Twitter