A businessman, Daniel Koranteng, has denied selling photographs of journalist Ahmed Hussein-Suale to MP Kennedy Agyapong before Suale’s tragic murder in 2019. Koranteng, also known as Nana Amakye, is currently in custody after being charged with murder, as prosecutors claim he was involved in the killing. How will this case unfold as investigations continue?
- Daniel Koranteng denies selling photos of Suale.
- He has been charged with murder.
- Call records link him to Suale's murder.
- Koranteng fled to the UK in 2019.
- He was arrested in Ghana on March 15, 2025.
- Ongoing investigations into the case.
Key Developments in the Ahmed Suale Murder Case You Should Know
What does this mean for justice in Ghana? The ongoing investigation into Ahmed Suale’s murder continues to reveal shocking details. Koranteng’s alleged connection to the case raises critical questions about accountability and the role of public figures in violent acts against journalists.
Understanding the Allegations Against Daniel Koranteng
Koranteng’s involvement in the murder of Ahmed Suale has sparked intense scrutiny. The prosecution claims he was near Suale’s residence during the murder and had previously visited Agyapong. Despite admitting to knowing Suale and taking photos with him, he denies selling those images. Here are some key points:
- Koranteng has been remanded in custody by the Madina District Court.
- Prosecutors cite call records linking him to the murder scene.
- He fled to the UK in 2019 but returned to Ghana in 2025.
- Committal proceedings are scheduled for April 1, 2025.
What Led to Koranteng’s Arrest and Charges?
Daniel Koranteng’s arrest followed a series of police invitations that he declined, prompting him to flee to the UK. After returning to Ghana, he was apprehended in Amasaman based on intelligence reports. This timeline raises questions about the effectiveness of law enforcement in addressing serious crimes against journalists.
The Impact of Ahmed Suale’s Murder on Press Freedom
The murder of Ahmed Suale has had a chilling effect on press freedom in Ghana and beyond. As journalists continue to face threats, this case underscores the urgent need for protective measures. The involvement of public figures like Kennedy Agyapong adds complexity to the narrative, highlighting the intersection of politics and media safety.
As the case progresses, the world watches closely to see how justice will be served and what it means for the future of journalism in Ghana and the protection of press freedom globally.
