In a thrilling Game 3 of the Eastern Conference finals, the New York Knicks clawed back to victory against the Indiana Pacers, marking a pivotal moment in the NBA playoffs. With Jalen Brunson, the Knicks’ second-team All-NBA guard, facing foul trouble, the Pacers seemed poised to take a commanding 3-0 series lead on May 26, 2025. However, the Knicks had other plans, pulling off a stunning comeback to win 106-100.
- Knicks overcome 20-point deficit to win.
- Brunson's foul trouble impacted Pacers' strategy.
- Indiana scored only 42 points in second half.
- Towns led Knicks' comeback with 24 points.
- Pacers failed to exploit Brunson's defensive weakness.
- Game 4 crucial for Indiana's series momentum.
Indiana had established a significant 20-point lead in the second quarter, but the Knicks’ resilience shone through, cutting the series deficit to 2-1. This unexpected turn raises questions about Indiana’s strategy moving forward.
The Pacers’ inability to capitalize on their early dominance was a critical turning point. Why did they fail to attack Brunson effectively? The Knicks’ late-game execution, particularly from Karl-Anthony Towns, was instrumental in their success. Key developments include:
- Brunson managed to stay on the court despite foul trouble, contributing crucial plays late.
- The Pacers scored just 42 points in the second half, a stark contrast to their earlier performance.
- Indiana’s offensive struggles were highlighted by a lack of aggression against Brunson.
- New York’s Towns scored 20 of his 24 points in the fourth quarter, leading the comeback.
As the series shifts back to Indiana for Game 4, the Pacers must regroup quickly. Will they adjust their strategy to avoid another shocking defeat? Fans are eagerly awaiting the next chapter in this gripping playoff saga.
