Belgium’s use of trajectcontroles (average speed cameras) has long sparked debate, but their impact on road safety cannot be ignored. Recent research highlights a 56 percent drop in serious accidents where these controls are active. Yet, on 2025-07-03 18:09:00, Flemish Mobility Minister Annick De Ridder announced the cancellation of 70 planned trajectcontrole locations.
- Trajectcontroles verminderen zware ongevallen met 56%
- Onderzoeker Stijn Daniels ondersteunt trajectcontroles effectiviteit
- Vlaams minister Annick De Ridder schrapt trajectcontroles
- Verkeersdeskundigen waarschuwen voor verkeersveiligheidseffecten
- Aantal geplande trajectcontroles vermindert door beleidsbeslissing
Why would the government reduce these safety measures when evidence suggests they save lives? Transport expert Stijn Daniels from Transport & Mobility Leuven warns that cutting back could reverse progress in reducing severe crashes. Other traffic specialists share concerns about the potential rise in road dangers.
As Belgium balances road safety and public opinion, what does this mean for drivers? Let’s explore the implications of scaling back trajectcontroles.
Could reducing trajectcontroles lead to more fatalities? Experts suggest so, noting:
- Trajectcontroles reduce heavy accidents by over half, according to recent studies.
- Public resistance and political decisions drive the removal of planned cameras.
- Traffic specialists warn that fewer controls may encourage speeding and reckless driving.
- The balance between road safety and public acceptance remains a challenging debate.
As this situation unfolds, Belgian authorities and drivers must stay vigilant. Will the benefits of trajectcontroles prompt a policy reversal, or will safety take a backseat? Only time will tell, but continued dialogue and research are essential for safer roads ahead.
